Username
Password
Incorrect — try admin / 1234
Username admin · Password 1234
Omnitech
Omni-Lox
Factory Health
Factory Health Score
78%
5 machines OK
2 need attention
Platform
Machines
⚙️
All Machines
7
Monitoring
📊
Disciplines
Static Control
Active — all machines
Energy
Available from Omnitech
💨
Compressed Air
Available from Omnitech
📳
Vibration
Available from Omnitech
More
🤖
AI Insights
What's Possible
⚙️
Settings
Factory Dashboard
Flexcon UK · Factory Health Overview
All Systems Normal
Last updated: --:--:--
🏭Factory Health
78%
2 machines need attention
Action Required
⚙️Machines Running
7/7
All machines operational
All Running
Site Energy Today
312kWh
Est. £87.36 at £0.28/kWh
Normal
Static Bars Active
26/28
2 bars need cleaning
Clean Required
Active Alerts 2
⚠️
PS2
Static bars overdue for cleaning — efficiency falling on bars 2 and 3
Clean Due
⚠️
SL2
Bar clean overdue — check at next roll change
Clean Due
All Clear
All systems operating normally
Static Level
3.1 kV
Limit: 5.0 kV
⛔️
Problem
Static bars are overdue for cleaning
📘
What to do
Clean bars at next machine stop — contact your engineer
Static Monitor — Live
Within Limit
Highest Zone
2.1 kV
0⚠ 5kV
Zone A1.8 kV
Zone B2.1 kV
Machine StopNo
PLC & Comms
Run Mode
ParameterValue
PLC StatusRun
EtherNet/IPConnected
Machine RunningYes
Line Speed28 m/min
Omni-IO (CC100)Online
Manager IQActive
Poll Rate250 ms
Energy & Predictive
Roadmap
ParameterValue
Energy Today62 kWh
Peak Demand14.2 kW
Motor VibrationNo sensor
Bearing TempNo sensor
Vibration sensors — Sensoteq wireless. Available from Omnitech.
Site Energy
312 kWh
Bars Active
26 / 28
Clean Warnings
2 machines
Network
14 / 14
One platform — four monitoring disciplines
All on one screen, one system, one support contract.
Available from Omnitech
Energy Monitoring
CT meters · 3-phase · ESOS
£1,240
/ month
Site energy cost
tracked automatically
Site energy today312 kWh
Peak demand68.4 kW
Highest machinePS2
vs last month↓ 4%
ESOS Phase 3
Per-machine metering
Shift reporting
💨
Compressed Air
Pressure · Flow · Leak detection
£380
/ month
Estimated air cost
currently unmetered
Main line pressure6.2 bar
Flow rate42 l/min
Leak detectedNone
Cost per shift£12.60
Leak detection
Cost per shift
Pressure trending
📳
Vibration & Predictive Maintenance
Sensoteq wireless · Bearing health
84%
of limit
Rewind motor bearing
trending upward
Coat head motor1.2 mm/s
Rewind motor3.8 mm/s ↑
Drive motor0.9 mm/s
Wireless sensors
Bearing temp
Failure prediction
🌡️
Temperature Monitoring
Cabinet cooling · Motor temps
PS1 cabinet28°C — OK
PS2 cabinet44°C — Warm
Coat head motor38°C — Normal
Rewind motor61°C — Monitor
Cabinet limit60°C
ATEX safe
Cabinet cooling
Motor protection
🔗
Remote Access & Alerts
Web app · Email & SMS · SCADA
Remote web accessflexcon.omnilox.co.uk
Email alertsActive
SMS alertsActive
SCADA data feedModbus TCP
ERP integrationOn request
5G connectivity
Any device
Omni-Comms
📊
Reporting & Compliance
Shift reports · ESOS · Audit trail
£2,840
saved
Estimated saving this year
from static control insight
Bar clean compliance94%
Unplanned stops MTD2
Energy reportAuto-generated
PDF export
Shift handover
ESOS ready
AI Insights
Pattern detection and predictive recommendations — updated continuously as data accumulates
🤖 AI Engine Active
Phase 3
High Priority
1
Immediate action
Medium Priority
3
Monitor this week
Estimated Annual Saving
£4,200
If all actions taken
Confidence Level
87%
Based on 90 days data
High Priority
PS2 · Static Control
Confidence: 94%
Bar 2 efficiency degrading 3× faster than historical average
Ionisation efficiency on BAR 02 (Coat Head) has dropped from 92% to 48% over 18 days — significantly faster than the usual 45-day clean cycle for this position. Pattern matches contamination from solvent misting. Recommend immediate clean rather than waiting for the scheduled interval.
Est. Annual Impact
£1,800
in waste if ignored
Detected: pattern analysis over last 90 days · Updated hourly
📈
Medium Priority
SL2 · Static Control
Confidence: 88%
Clean interval should be reduced from 14 to 10 days on Slitter 2
Analysis of 6 cleaning cycles shows SL2 consistently reaches warning threshold at day 10–11, suggesting the 14-day interval is too long for this machine's duty cycle. Reducing the interval would prevent static warnings and maintain higher average efficiency.
Est. Annual Impact
£640
efficiency improvement
Based on 6 complete clean cycles · 90 days of data
🌡️
Medium Priority
PS2 · Temperature
Confidence: 82%
PS2 control cabinet temperature rising trend — monitor for cooling issue
Cabinet temperature has increased from 31°C to 44°C over the past 3 weeks. Rate of increase suggests either filter blockage or cooling fan degradation. If trend continues, cabinet will reach 60°C limit within 8–10 days. Temperature sensors available as part of Phase 2 expansion.
Est. Time to Limit
8 days
at current trend
Available with Phase 2 temperature sensors installed
Positive Finding
PS1 & TC1 · Static Control
Confidence: 96%
New cleaning procedure is working — PS1 efficiency up 8% since last month
Since the updated cleaning procedure was introduced on PS1 and TC1, average bar efficiency has increased from 88% to 95%. The rate of degradation between cleans has also slowed, suggesting less contamination reaching the bars. Recommend rolling this procedure out to PS2 and SL lines.
Est. Annual Saving
£1,760
if rolled out site-wide
Detected: efficiency trend analysis · Last 30 days vs previous 30 days
Bars Active
26/28
2 bars need cleaning
Clean Warnings
2
PS2 and SL2
Avg Efficiency
87%
Across all active bars
Highest Static
3.1 kV
PS2 — limit 5.0 kV
PS1
4/4 Active
Efficiency94%
Static level1.8 kV
Last clean4 days ago
PS2
Clean Due
Efficiency48%
Static level3.1 kV
Last clean18 days ago
TC1
3/3 Active
Efficiency95%
Static level1.2 kV
Last clean6 days ago
TC2
3/3 Active
Efficiency97%
Static level0.9 kV
Last clean5 days ago
SL1
3/3 Active
Efficiency93%
Static level1.4 kV
Last clean3 days ago
SL2
Clean Due
Efficiency46%
Static level2.4 kV
Last clean21 days ago
SL3
3/3 Active
Efficiency94%
Static level1.1 kV
Last clean2 days ago
🤖
AI Insight
Static Control · Pattern Detected
Confidence: 94%
PS2 Bar 2 degrading 3× faster than historical average — recommend immediate clean
Ionisation efficiency has dropped from 92% to 48% in 18 days vs the usual 45-day cycle. Pattern matches solvent misting contamination. Estimated annual impact if ignored: £1,800.
Site Energy Today
312 kWh
Est. £87.36 at £0.28/kWh
Peak Demand
68.4 kW
06:00 shift start
vs Yesterday
↓ 4%
296 kWh yesterday
This Month
£1,240
Projected energy cost
Machine Energy Breakdown — Today
All values estimated — CT meters required for live data
Machine Type Est. kWh Est. Cost % of Site Share
PS1Primary Coating68 kWh£19.0422%
PS2Primary Coating89 kWh£24.9229%
TC1Top Coat42 kWh£11.7613%
TC2Top Coat38 kWh£10.6412%
SL1–SL3Slitters75 kWh£21.0024%
🤖
AI Insight
Energy · Pattern Detected
Confidence: 88%
PS2 consuming 22% more energy than PS1 for equivalent output — investigate efficiency gap
PS2 is running at higher power draw despite similar line speeds. Pattern suggests drive inefficiency or additional load. Estimated annual saving if resolved: £2,100. CT meters required for confirmed live data.
Current Flow
42.1 L/min
Within normal range
Line Pressure
6.1 bar
Nominal: 6.0–6.5 bar
Leak Status
✓ No Leak
Within ±15% of baseline
Est. Monthly Cost
£380
Currently unmetered
Main Supply Line
6.1 bar
0 bar8.0 bar max
Flow42 l/min
Compressor hours6.4 hrs
Filter Status
OK
CleanReplace at 100%
Filter ΔP760 Pa
Next service~42 days
Leak Detection
✓ No Leak
Flow is within ±15% of baseline (43.2 L/min). No leak signature detected in last 24 hours.
Baseline flow43.2 l/min
Leak threshold+15%
🤖
AI Insight
Compressed Air · Usage Pattern
Confidence: 81%
Air consumption 18% higher on night shift — possible overnight leak or equipment left running
Flow data shows a consistent pattern of elevated consumption between 22:00 and 06:00 when machines should be idle. Estimated annual cost of overnight waste: £840. Recommend pressure test after shutdown.
Sensors Active
3/3
All sensors reporting
Highest Reading
3.8 mm/s
Rewind motor — rising
ISO Alert Limit
4.5 mm/s
ISO 10816 Zone B/C limit
Predicted Failure
18 days
Rewind motor at current trend
Coat Head Motor
Healthy
Sensoteq wireless · Bearing A
1.2 mm/s
0Warn 2.0Alert 4.5
Bearing temp38 °C
TrendStable
Rewind Motor
Rising
Sensoteq wireless · Bearing B
3.8 mm/s
0Warn 2.0Alert 4.5
Bearing temp61 °C
Trend↑ Rising — monitor
Drive Motor
Healthy
Sensoteq wireless · Bearing C
0.9 mm/s
0Warn 2.0Alert 4.5
Bearing temp34 °C
TrendStable
🤖
AI Insight
Vibration · Predictive Alert
Confidence: 91%
Rewind motor bearing approaching alert threshold — plan maintenance within 18 days
Vibration rising at 0.12 mm/s per day. At this rate the ISO alert limit (4.5 mm/s) will be reached in approximately 18 days. Bearing temperature also elevated at 61°C. Last bearing replacement was 14 months ago. Estimated cost of unplanned failure: £8,400 in downtime.
⚙️ Demo Settings — Changes apply instantly across all screens.
📍
Site & Customer
Customer Name
Site / Location
Platform Description
🏭
Machine Names
PS1 Description
PS2 Description
TC1 Description
TC2 Description
Static Thresholds
Safety Limit (kV)
Warning Level (kV)
Bar Clean Interval (days)
🔔
Alerts & Billing
Alert Email
Alert SMS
Power Tariff (£/kWh)
Changes apply instantly across all screens
Demo Controls
Simulate fault conditions